Tweak

InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "woot woot!"

Username: 
Password:    
Remember Me
  • Create Account
  • IJ Login
  • OpenID Login
Search by : 
  • View
    • Create Account
    • IJ Login
    • OpenID Login
  • Journal
    • Post
    • Edit Entries
    • Customize Journal
    • Comment Settings
    • Recent Comments
    • Manage Tags
  • Account
    • Manage Account
    • Viewing Options
    • Manage Profile
    • Manage Notifications
    • Manage Pictures
    • Manage Schools
    • Account Status
  • Friends
    • Edit Friends
    • Edit Custom Groups
    • Friends Filter
    • Nudge Friends
    • Invite
    • Create RSS Feed
  • Asylums
    • Post
    • Asylum Invitations
    • Manage Asylums
    • Create Asylum
  • Site
    • Support
    • Upgrade Account
    • FAQs
    • Search By Location
    • Search By Interest
    • Search Randomly

paranone ([info]paranone) wrote,
@ 2009-05-24 22:07:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:by: dorian gray

Announcements
[FILTER: All Personnel]

My confederates,

Since I took up the mantle from my predecessor earlier this month I had been keen on studying the work that she has accomplished during her term--unfortunately cut short--of managing the Bureau. I have reached a conclusion and I would like to take this moment to share it with you.

Layla Miller governed the Bureau with what I see to be a laissez faire style of leadership, eager as she must be to empower the agents, trust in their capabilities, thereby cultivating independence and motivation. No doubt, this has produced excellent work in the past.

However I must tell you now. My method is not similar to Ms. Miller's. Allow me to justify why I will be managing the organization differently.

For our affiliates and those who recognise our work, the B.P.R.D. is a special agency of the highest calibre. They look to us with a great deal of respect and trust, such that must only be properly reciprocated. To tell you the truth, there had been criticisms in the way Ms. Miller had run our agency, especially during the problem with the Book. They saw that it was too lax and detached, even. There were suspicions that the agents have not undergone sufficient training and worse, there are claims that they have behaved questionably leading to some untoward incidents that had placed our public in danger. I am most troubled to say that these are not mere accusations as they are supported by reports and evidence.

My friends, I am not pointing these out to admonish you. Far from it. I write this as a point of deep concern, such that we as an organisation must collectively remedy lest we lose our reputation, our respectability, and ultimately our survival altogether. I promise you this will not happen under my watch. A lot of work needs to be done. I will personally see to this.

To begin with, I have decided to require all members of the Bureau to undergo a Reevaluation and Reassessment from the Deputy Director down the line. Mr. Jenkins have provided me all the files I need and I as your Director, only ask for your utmost cooperation and expect nothing less. Anything else will be regarded with suspicion, and may lead to forced removal under the grounds of insubordination. More information on these will be disclosed as soon as they are available. You may rest assure that all of this is for the better good of our organisation.

That will be all. Thank you and Good Day, Fairfield.

[FILTER: Kula Diamond] Hello Kula, would you drop by my office this Friday noon? I'd also appreciate it if you tell no one about my invitation.



(Post a new comment)

Filter: Directory
[info]icecrystal
2009-05-24 09:19 am UTC (link)
Friday, noon. Okay! Kula will do that.

(Reply to this)


[info]lucky_valentine
2009-05-24 12:01 pm UTC (link)
So Westley is doing this? By himself?

(Reply to this)


[info]jet_black
2009-05-24 01:58 pm UTC (link)
Hypothetically speaking, if we mark low on the reassessment/reeval, will we be dismissed or retrained?

(Reply to this)


[info]ray_of_light
2009-05-24 09:44 pm UTC (link)
From a political standpoint, I have not heard of any concerns from those officials with whom I've dealt with in the past. I am curious as to where the criticisms originated, for I was not made aware of them formally.

(Reply to this)

Filter: Director
[info]micro_waves
2009-05-31 06:15 am UTC (link)
Forced removal under the grounds of insubordination? What are we? High school students?

Good of our organisation my ass. I'm sure we're all a little more mature than that.

And are we allowed to know what exactly your standards are?

(Reply to this)


[info]technologykit
2009-05-31 06:22 am UTC (link)
All members?

Um, sir, I'm certified in both field and weapons and technology, does that mean I'm going to have to be re-evaluated on both scales?

(Reply to this)




Home | Site Map | Manage Account | TOS | Privacy | Support | FAQs